Close Menu
On Common Ground News – 24/7 local newsOn Common Ground News – 24/7 local news
  • Home
  • Local News
    • Atlanta
    • DeKalb
    • Rockdale
    • Gwinnett
    • City of Stonecrest
  • Legal Notices
  • HelpLines
  • Crime
  • Coming Up
  • Business
  • Education
  • Life
    • People
    • Restaurants
    • Travel
    • Explore
    • Special Events
    • Community Calendar
    • 2021 Graduates
    • COVID-19
  • Op/Ed
  • Obituaries
What's Hot

Fulton County Superior Court judge reinstates Daniel Blackman on ballot in Georgia PSC race amid residency dispute

May 30, 2025

Gwinnett County: Goodfellas gang members get life sentences for murdering check cashing store owner

May 30, 2025

City of Stonecrest sets public hearings on 2025 proposed property tax increase

May 29, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
[Valid RSS]
On Common Ground News – 24/7 local newsOn Common Ground News – 24/7 local news
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Home
  • Local News
    • Atlanta
    • DeKalb
    • Rockdale
    • Gwinnett
    • City of Stonecrest
  • Legal Notices
  • HelpLines
  • Crime
  • Coming Up
  • Business
  • Education
  • Life
    • People
    • Restaurants
    • Travel
    • Explore
    • Special Events
    • Community Calendar
    • 2021 Graduates
    • COVID-19
  • Op/Ed
  • Obituaries
On Common Ground News – 24/7 local newsOn Common Ground News – 24/7 local news
Home»Op/Ed»MARTA: Is DeKalb’s penny worth the same as Gwinnett and Clayton?
Ed Williams

MARTA: Is DeKalb’s penny worth the same as Gwinnett and Clayton?

2
By On Common Ground News on October 12, 2018 Op/Ed, DeKalb
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
Ed Williams

 By Ed Williams

 

DeKalb County was instrumental in forming MARTA in1964 and the 1971 contract which funded MARTA was fueled by support of DeKalb voters.    It was a DeKalb legislator who sponsored the bill in the state General Assembly to begin MARTA in the early sixties.

There are four DeKalb MARTA board members – one of them is supposed to be a resident of South DeKalb that lives south of the boundary of City of Decatur. However, none of the current DeKalb MARTA board members meet that criteria.  We are suffering for the lack of representation. Indeed, the MARTA Act is being violated.

Public transportation and accommodations is a civil right and we, as citizens of the state of Georgia, and residents of DeKalb County should expect our tax money and agreements to be equitable and fair.  We demand that we be treated equally. There is no separation of the MARTA funds as the monies are co-mingled with other projects.   We are not even sure what the total amount of MARTA debt is.

The More MARTA project , which was just approved by the MARTA board , included the Atlanta Beltline and Streetcar, which were neither part of the MARTA projects and were not mentioned in the City of Atlanta half penny referendum.   Nevertheless, the Beltline and Streetcar projects were added to the MARTA project list ahead of projects that have been on the list for decades including those slated for DeKalb.

MARTA needs more accountability and transparency of the revenue collected and spent on each and every project.  The amount of revenue collected and debt of MARTA should be known to all the stakeholders.  The quality of buses, number of bus shelters, bus stop signs restrooms, tunnel ventilation and other services are not equal.

The contract that DeKalb , Fulton and the City of Atlanta signed with MARTA in September 1971 was for 50 years.  The RTCAA contract will expire in 2021.  The DeKalb agreement included a 1 penny sales tax for 11 years. And it was supposed to be reduced to a half penny the remainder of the 39 years.  The penny sales tax has been extended more than five times since 1971 by the General Assembly without voter referendum.  In 2007, the sales tax was extended to 2047, and also a bill was passed  by the General Assembly in 2015 HB213.    Again, the sales tax was extended in 2015 HB213, even though the MARTA agreement ends in 2021.  The original 1971 MARTA contract required a voter referendum. However, without any referendum by the voters of DeKalb, the General Assembly extended the 1 penny. Our state delegation should be prepared to roll back that extension and to seek voter approval for any sales tax extension.

There are 38 rapid rail train stations in the MARTA system, and only 10 of them are in DeKalb.  Two of those 10 are in the city of Atlanta.  The last one in South DeKalb was completed in 1993 which is Indian Creek station.  Only 25 percent of stations are in DeKalb, while we make up at least 40% of the population who has paid into the system for almost 50 years.

Moving forward, we need DeKalb BOC members to support a 100M capital budget amendment by M ARTA prior to December 15 for restricted funding of Right of Way and other construction cost s for I-20 East instead of the purchase of new heavy rail cars which is outlined in the FY2019 Proposed Capital Budget.

The citizens of DeKalb should be prepared to demand that our  Board of Commissioners be prepared to fight for a comparable new contract with M ARTA similar to Gwinnett’s 30-70% control of its 1 penny Marta sales tax.  It is not fair for DeKalb citizens who help ed build MARTA ‘s foundation be required to pay more than counties like Clayton and Gwinnett.  Fulton County and Atlanta have most of the assets, and DeKalb is getting screwed.  We have been part of the MARTA system from day one and yet we are being treated like dropouts and second class citizens.

We need County Commissioners and DeKalb M ARTA board members who will support South and North DeKalb rail expansion first over any other projects with the current 1 penny sales tax per the 1971 RTCAA. We should have public hearings in DeKalb County prior to Dec 31 in regards to the impact of new LRT and Street Car construction debt payments from the current 1 penny sales tax that already has $ 3 billion in principal and interest payments.

In order to have trains going down I-20, we should support restricted Right of Way acquisition funding for I-20 West rail expansion.  We want published time lines and public hearings in Atlanta and DeKalb prior to Dec 15 to reopen restrooms and to have discussion on limited 24-7 hr rail service to the airport and other job centers.

Both M ARTA and DeKalb master plans should provide written verification of the costs and options of heavy rail and light rail.  We do not need any more studies.  There should be public hearings that provide real data.  It is MARTA ‘s job to provide the data to support the route and the type of rail for us to make a sound decision.

Ed Williams heads Concerned Citizens For Effective Government.

Post Views: 4,475
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
On Common Ground News

Related Posts

City of Stonecrest sets public hearings on 2025 proposed property tax increase

May 29, 2025

Join the celebration! Rotary Club of Stone Mountain to host 60th Diamond Anniversary Jazz Brunch June 7

May 29, 2025

Former DeKalb County officer negotiates guilty plea in fatal shooting of unarmed veteran Anthony Hill after decade-long legal battle

May 28, 2025
View 2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Do Better DeKalb on October 12, 2018 6:33 pm

    Should we have rail with the density that is required for rail to be successful? I’m ok with BRT if they make it super snazzy with wifi, comfortable seats and nice and clean with air/heat. If you want the area to stay suburban then heavy rail is the way to go. If you want high rises at Stonecrest Mall then yes, I say go with heavy rail.

    Reply
  2. Jim Hanley on October 14, 2018 6:53 am

    It’s not hard to guess the cost – LRS capital cost is inherently cheaper then HRS, but the trading is in line extensions – existing HRS if extended should continue to use HRS so not to require train switching. Long term sustainment of LRS is cheaper, but there is the need for new training, whole new train yards, etc.
    The line configuration is another aspect – a simple two rail system would be the cheapest, but providing station bypass for express may provide more value during rush hour.
    Right-of-way using street at grade alignment is also the cheapest but then requires trains to follow street posted speeds, cut and cover is probably 5 times the cost per distance but temporarily disrupts traffic flow during construction and boring is about 10 times the cost per distace.
    IMHO, MARTA has been transparent regarding plans, costs, and resident input – I believe the main issue is risk aversion. Underestimating FUD complains have played a big role in MARTA’s legacy perception and ultimately it’s underperfmance. New uncertainties such as disruptions like Uber/Lyft and lessons learned from securing strong resident buyin have made them stuck in a perpetual cycle of being non-comital do literal ground breaking on capex rail project expansions.

    Reply
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Latest Post

Fulton County Superior Court judge reinstates Daniel Blackman on ballot in Georgia PSC race amid residency dispute

May 30, 2025

Gwinnett County: Goodfellas gang members get life sentences for murdering check cashing store owner

May 30, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news updates from OCGNews.

RSS On Common Ground News – 24/7 local news
  • Fulton County Superior Court judge reinstates Daniel Blackman on ballot in Georgia PSC race amid residency dispute May 31, 2025
    ATLANTA—Daniel Blackman, Democratic candidate for Georgia’s Public Service Commission District 3 seat, is officially back on the ballot after a Fulton County Superior Court judge issued an injunction on Friday, May 30, against the Secretary of State for disqualifying him.  Blackman has bounced on and off the ballot since Early Voting for the primary got […]
Recent Comments
  • Isaac McNeill on Here’s a look at the aftermath of the tornado that hit Rockdale County.
  • G on DeKalb County: Mother convicted after confronting man who molested her daughter
  • Jo Handy-Sewell on Southwest DeKalb High’s tennis team wins off the court with community service to help feed those in need
About Us
About Us

On Common Ground News is published 24/7 by On Common Ground, Inc (OCGNEWS.COM).
The news outlet was founded in April, 1995.

Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube
Latest Posts
  • Fulton County Superior Court judge reinstates Daniel Blackman on ballot in Georgia PSC race amid residency dispute
  • Gwinnett County: Goodfellas gang members get life sentences for murdering check cashing store owner
  • City of Stonecrest sets public hearings on 2025 proposed property tax increase
  • Join the celebration! Rotary Club of Stone Mountain to host 60th Diamond Anniversary Jazz Brunch June 7

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest news updates from OCGNews.

© 2025 On Common Ground News.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Do not sell my personal information.
Cookie SettingsAccept
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}